Back in the 90s I learned the basics of Photoshop and Illustrator from uni days and quite a few decades later did a refresher course for TAFE while doing web design. I still use Photoshop, my editing is fairly basic and I know free alternatives which I will also use. When I do any vector graphics now I go to InkScape because I am unfamiliar with it and I like to create really glitchy illustrations.
Because I know the ins and outs of Adobe Illustrator I can’t use it because in Inkscape I screw up so badly from the lack of familiarity and it does oddball stuff that I could never think of and it’s just a home baked job for me. There are people who can use it and know it of course. When I see something that makes sense in Inkscape I keep pushing it until something unexpected happens and I no longer know what I did or what has happened.
I suppose there is a permeability in Inkscape maybe from how it is built that isn’t as strictly delineated as Illustrator. You can still make a mess in Illustrator but it’s easier in Inkscape. The open source SVG format is also a little buggy and if you don’t output a raster image formatting can get lost in the vector format. So some things are one offs and don’t even stay the way you originally did them. I like that.
derekjamescarter 
As an example of your approach. One of the combat aircraft in the “Great War”, I think the Sopwith Camel, maybe? What the pilots discovered if they just let go of the joystick when they were about to get their tail shot off or worse. The aircraft would suddenly go into unpredictable maneuvers, so if the pilot had no idea where he was going neither did the blasted jerry behind him. Another creative way of harnessing entropy for an unpredictable result. Thus, removing one’s hardwired, often predictable output. 😉