Orange phosphorous glow

It is easy to get worked up by what looks like hypocrisy from so and so. Let’s just backtrack, there have been many US presidents who have criticised Israel for example. Politics and mediation should create progress but if US policy was to fully support Palestinian independence they would also by default be supporting resistance.

All of the political discourse on the issue for decades hasn’t changed the plight of the Palestinian people and it is first and foremost a dialog. The big orange man is not a politician and just says stuff without the political dialog which was only there to create a veil of concern. Talking doesn’t do a lot and if you are saying more than you are doing nothing changes.

I mean if all of the political posturing did something there would have been change decades ago. The guy with the orange tinge is just coming out with the position that has been there all along. Nothing was ever meant to change and decades of so and so has a right to defend itself was just saying lets bide our time and keep the mask on.

I am in no way saying people aren’t genuinely concerned or it’s some doom and gloom prognosis but instead just want to point out the obvious. Nothing has changed except the delivery. In Australian politics Turnbull (quite fitting name) was an expert in keeping a moderate dialog. Abbott was the polar opposite of Turnbull and ran his mouth. Yet they were both basically pushing the same policies.

The policies they were pursuing were in my book terrible, a corporate support network that didn’t benefit anybody but big money. It was just that one of them would talk nice and the other was unbearable. They were in the same political party and now both major parties sound the same. Just keep big money sorted at all costs. The orange guy said let’s support the displacement (death sentence) of a whole ethnic group.

It looks different to what has happened before but building walls, military checkpoints and the containment (tyranny) over decades is no different. But why? Because the powers at be don’t value life and culture. But why? Because numbers, power, control, colonialism, imperialism and a bunch of absolute pricks who want to fix (fix it like a mafia boss fixes things) the problems/solutions – solutions/problems paradigm.

Ok so the only change is the delivery but fundamentally it’s the same and there has only been talk of a two party solution. There is no two party solution and some people just want the dialog to run on forever while people are decimated. They have been in this position forever in a downward creep, now it’s the US and their final solution which was the problem from the day their land was stolen off them, fully supported by western powers.

So the dialog of concern was just a ruse for a problem the US made in the first place. The mask is off showing an orange glow but the mask was just there to make you feel like something was being done when nothing but supporting the status quo was being done. The words were like all of the songs, movies, shopping zones, renovated cafes, a manufactured facade wirth zero substance to placate you while the killing went on unabated. 

2 thoughts on “Orange phosphorous glow

  1. Julia Gillard, the cunt, fled back to the Brookings Institute and Malcom Turnbull was an employee of Goldman Sachs. Need I say more?. Everything you’ve said there is brilliant and cuts it to the bone. The parties which had some purpose to their movement in the 70’s are now just chasing the same dragon riding an entrenched institution with a legacy party for disguise and an endless stream of power hungry and obnoxious bureaucrats itching to get their hands on anything they can embezzle.

Leave a reply to Pat Mellow Cancel reply